Central in the research of Kate Spence is providing insight on how the current determination of the pyramid of Giza can be measured using the simultaneous transit method of alignment. The basis of the approach focuses on the field of astronomy where analysis is administered based on the vertical alignment of two stars (Spence 322). To further support her claim, Spence utilized mathematical modelling to assess the value of the method. The conclusions indicated the ability of simultaneous transit method to determine the timeframe when the pyramids were built with only a margin of +/- 5 years (Spence 324). The outcome can help redefine the historical data available.

Analyzing the author’s writing style, readers can recognize Spence’s familiarity and expertise in the research. Many of the words used relate to information coming from the field of astronomy. This can pose a challenge for others who have limited background in the discipline. However, to be fair, Spence tries to simplify the information the best way she could. It is however in the explanation of methods and results that she needs to make use of technical terms. Another notable point is the structure and flow of the study. Readers can easily determine each section because Spence made an effort to provide subheadings and guide readers.

Moreover, the central theme that Spence is trying to associate in the text is the validity of creating timestamps to pyramids based on astronomical orientation. Here, she allows readers to consider the method by trying to offer astronomical modelling. The data gathered are then given specific connections based on geometric and astronomy concepts. This technical information are then assessed with a mathematical formula that allows the results to be explained.

Overall, the reading provides an objective attempt to bridge the existing literature on the issue of properly delineating the actual timeline that the pyramids at Giza were built. Spence sought to use a non-conventional approach by applying astronomical orientation in the analysis. Based on how she chose the methodology and analysis, her work can provide an alternative interpretation to reconstructing Egyptian history. Giving emphasis on her methods also enables Spence to develop a structure of astronomy into the analysis. Through the use of mathematical models and charts, there is the possibility to link and offer objective and evidence-supported explanations.

Work Cited

Spence, Kate. ‘Ancient Egyptian chronology of astronomical orientation of pyramids,’ Nature

408.1(Nov.2000): 320-324.